Thompkins v. State
This text of 222 S.W. 1103 (Thompkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This conviction was for theft, two years in the penitentiary being the punishment assessed.
The appeal must be dismissed because the record does not contain a sentence. The sentence, being the final judgment, is necessary to *Page 503 attach the jurisdiction of this court in appeal felony cases. Collated cases may be found in Branch's P.C., p. 338, C.C.P., Art. 853, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P., p. 851. But for this omission in the record the judgment should be affirmed. The two bills of exception taken on the trial are not filed in time granted for that purpose. Court adjourned March 20th. The court granted thirty days in which bills of exception might be filed. The bills were not filed until in early part of May, and could not, therefore, be considered.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 S.W. 1103, 87 Tex. Crim. 502, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompkins-v-state-texcrimapp-1920.