Thompkins v. State
576 So. 2d 915, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2666, 1991 WL 41043
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1991·No. No. 90-00963·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals his departure sentences based upon multiple violations of probation. We affirm on the authority of Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) and Williams v. State, 559 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We certify to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Williams, 559 So.2d at 681.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompkins v. State, 576 So. 2d 915, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2666, 1991 WL 41043 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
576 So. 2d 915 (Thompkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompkins v. State
594 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Wolfe v. State
576 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)