Thomasson v. Sentinel Transportation, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 21, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-01172·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 MATTHEW THOMASSON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01172-BAK (SKO) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER CLOSING THE CASE ) 13 v. ) (Doc. 34) ) 14 SENTINEL TRANSPORTATION, LLC, )

15 Defendant. ) ) 16 )

17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes 18 of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party’s own attorney’s fees and costs. (Doc. 34). 19 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately without 20 further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: April 21, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomasson v. Sentinel Transportation, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Thomasson v. Sentinel Transportation, LLC (Thomasson v. Sentinel Transportation, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)