Thomassen v. J & K Diner, Inc.
559 N.E.2d 673, 76 N.Y.2d 771, 559 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1411
This text of 559 N.E.2d 673 (Thomassen v. J & K Diner, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomassen v. J & K Diner, Inc., 559 N.E.2d 673, 76 N.Y.2d 771, 559 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1411 (N.Y. 1990).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the stipulation for judgment absolute, under the facts of this case, is illusory and frustrates the purpose of CPLR 5601 (c) (Goldberg v Elkom Co., 36 NY2d 914).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goldberg v. Elkom Co.
334 N.E.2d 600 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
559 N.E.2d 673, 76 N.Y.2d 771, 559 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomassen-v-j-k-diner-inc-ny-1990.