Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works

68 S.E. 945, 8 Ga. App. 240, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 119
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 20, 1910
Docket2224
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 945 (Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works, 68 S.E. 945, 8 Ga. App. 240, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The defendant’s plea failing to present any issuable defense, tlie demurrer thereto was properly sustained. V Judgment affirmed.

Citations by counsel: Acte 1901, p. 65; Acts 1903, p. 94; 4 Ga. App. 232, 234; 132 Ga. 533-4; 114 Ga. 666, 668; 94 Ga. 14; 83 Ga. 33; 62 Ga. 617; 54 Ga. 490. R. G. Harts field, for plaintiff in error. Tye, Peeples, Bryan & Jordan, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co.
117 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 945, 8 Ga. App. 240, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomason-v-swift-fertilizer-works-gactapp-1910.