Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works

Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works

68 S.E. 945, 8 Ga. App. 240, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 119
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 20, 1910·No. 2224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

The defendant’s plea failing to present any issuable defense, tlie demurrer thereto was properly sustained. V Judgment affirmed.

Citations by counsel: Acte 1901, p. 65; Acts 1903, p. 94; 4 Ga. App. 232, 234; 132 Ga. 533-4; 114 Ga. 666, 668; 94 Ga. 14; 83 Ga. 33; 62 Ga. 617; 54 Ga. 490. R. G. Harts field, for plaintiff in error. Tye, Peeples, Bryan & Jordan, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works, 68 S.E. 945, 8 Ga. App. 240, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 945 (Thomason v. Swift Fertilizer Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co.
117 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)