Thomason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thomason v. State

395 So. 2d 293, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18946

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1981

DocketNo. 80-383

StatusPublished

This text of 395 So. 2d 293 (Thomason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomason v. State, 395 So. 2d 293, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18946 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Bobby Wayne Thomason appeals from an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to one year imprisonment on a previous battery conviction. Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to the charge that he violated his probation. On this appeal, he contends that the lower court erred in finding him to be in violation of his probation.

The Public Defender has filed an An-ders ¹ motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On June 3, 1980, this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been submitted.

Appellant’s plea of nolo contendere without an express reservation of the right to appeal bars a direct appeal from the lower court's order. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). See Wells v. State, 390 So.2d 808 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Therefore the motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is granted and this appeal is DISMISSED.

ORFINGER, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Bobby Wayne Thomason appeals from an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to one year imprisonment on a previous battery conviction. Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to the charge that he violated his probation. On this appeal, he contends that the lower court erred in finding him to be in violation of his probation.

The Public Defender has filed an An-ders ¹ motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On June 3, 1980, this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been submitted.

Appellant’s plea of nolo contendere without an express reservation of the right to appeal bars a direct appeal from the lower court's order. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). See Wells v. State, 390 So.2d 808 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Therefore the motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is granted and this appeal is DISMISSED.

ORFINGER, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 So. 2d 293, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomason-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack