Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand

191 A.D.2d 490, 596 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2106

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1993·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated September 14, 1990, [491] as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Where, as here, the papers offered on a motion for summary judgment show that there are triable issues of fact, summary judgment is properly denied (see, Gordon v Pellillo, 184 AD2d 494). Balletta, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated September 14, 1990, [491] as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Where, as here, the papers offered on a motion for summary judgment show that there are triable issues of fact, summary judgment is properly denied (see, Gordon v Pellillo, 184 AD2d 494). Balletta, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand, 191 A.D.2d 490, 596 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

191 A.D.2d 490 (Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related