Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand

191 A.D.2d 490, 596 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2106

This text of 191 A.D.2d 490 (Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomason Industries Corp. v. Gelfand, 191 A.D.2d 490, 596 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated September 14, 1990, [491]*491as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Where, as here, the papers offered on a motion for summary judgment show that there are triable issues of fact, summary judgment is properly denied (see, Gordon v Pellillo, 184 AD2d 494). Balletta, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. Pellillo
184 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 A.D.2d 490, 596 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomason-industries-corp-v-gelfand-nyappdiv-1993.