Thomashefsky v. Supreme Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomashefsky v. Supreme Court

232 A.D.2d 572, 648 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10481

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1996·Published

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit any further proceedings against the petitioner in the matter entitled People v Frank Thomashefsky in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Indictment Nos. 1905/82 and 2568/82.

Motion by the respondents to dismiss the proceeding.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements (see, Cosgrove v Hanson, 58 AD2d 911). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit any further proceedings against the petitioner in the matter entitled People v Frank Thomashefsky in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Indictment Nos. 1905/82 and 2568/82.

Motion by the respondents to dismiss the proceeding.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements (see, Cosgrove v Hanson, 58 AD2d 911). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Thomashefsky v. Supreme Court, 232 A.D.2d 572, 648 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

232 A.D.2d 572 (Thomashefsky v. Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related