Thomas Williams v. United States of America, Lindsey McDaniel v. United States

255 F.2d 896, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 144, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1958
Docket14186_1
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 255 F.2d 896 (Thomas Williams v. United States of America, Lindsey McDaniel v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas Williams v. United States of America, Lindsey McDaniel v. United States, 255 F.2d 896, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 144, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, together with one Jackie J. Floyd, were indicted for common law murder, murder in perpetration of a felony, and robbery. Floyd has not been tried because of his mental condition. Appellants were tried only on the counts for murder in the perpetration of a felony, and for robbery, the count charging premeditated murder having been dismissed as to them. Two trials by jury resulted in mistrials, the first because the jury was unable to agree on a verdict and the second because a juror was unable to complete the deliberations. A third trial followed before a district judge alone, trial by jury having been duly waived. The judge acquitted appellants of the murder charge and convicted them of robbery, as aiders and abettors rather than as principals. It is from the resulting judgments that they appeal. 1

Appellants question the admissibility of certain evidence, the sufficiency of *897 the evidence, and the validity of the robbery conviction on the ground of its alleged inconsistency with their acquittal of the charge of murder in the perpetration of the robbery. Upon consideration of these and all other questions raised we find no basis for reversal and the judgments are

Affirmed.

1

. Appellants were tried together. They took separate appeals from the separate judgments, but the two eases were here consolidated for briefing and argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Christman
61 Misc. 2d 1084 (New York County Courts, 1970)
The People v. Wright
242 N.E.2d 180 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Warner
237 A.2d 150 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1967)
Frederick Elmo Thompson, Jr. v. United States
382 F.2d 390 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
State v. Carpenter
150 N.W.2d 129 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1967)
Scott v. United States
228 A.2d 637 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1967)
James H. Harris v. United States
370 F.2d 477 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
Alire v. People
402 P.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1965)
Thomas Williams v. United States
335 F.2d 290 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
Albert Douglas Davis v. United States
327 F.2d 301 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 F.2d 896, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 144, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-williams-v-united-states-of-america-lindsey-mcdaniel-v-united-cadc-1958.