Thomas Wayne Nguyen v. United States Department of Defense
This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Thomas Wayne Nguyen v. United States Department of Defense) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas Wayne NGUYEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-2677.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.
Thomas Wayne Nguyen, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order finding that a prefiling injunction barred consideration of this action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nguyen v. Department of Defense, No. CA-95-653-R (E.D.Va. Aug. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40401, 1995 WL 761062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-wayne-nguyen-v-united-states-department-of--ca4-1995.