Thomas Wayne Florence v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 2022
Docket01-20-00556-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Thomas Wayne Florence v. the State of Texas (Thomas Wayne Florence v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas Wayne Florence v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Thomas Wayne Florence v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-20-00556-CR

Trial court case number: 10-CR-1217

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, Thomas Wayne Florence, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion entitled “Request for Leave of Court to Supplement the Appendix Record and for [] Judicial Notice be Taken on State of Texas Chief Law Enforcement ‘Paternity Child Support and You’ [] Prior to Submission.” This motion asks the Court to consider a document apparently published by the Office of Attorney General. Ten days have passed without a response from the State. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Generally, courts may take judicial notice of facts that are not subject to reasonable dispute. TEX. R. EVID. 201(b). However, an “appellate court may not consider factual assertions that are outside the record” on appeal or consider documents that were not before the trial court when it issued the challenged ruling. Cooks v. State, 190 S.W.3d 84, 89 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005), aff’d, 240 S.W.3d 906 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Elwell v. State, 872 S.W.2d 797, 799 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1994, pet. ref’d). Here, the document which appellant asks this Court to judicially notice is not included in the record on appeal, and it was not before the trial court when the trial court issued the ruling that appellant challenges in this appeal. Accordingly, the Court denies the motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 6, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooks v. State
190 S.W.3d 84 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Cooks v. State
240 S.W.3d 906 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Elwell v. State
872 S.W.2d 797 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas Wayne Florence v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-wayne-florence-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.