Thomas Walker & Co. v. Mercer & DeGraffenried

41 Ga. 44
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

WARNER, J.

This was a suit on an open account for $17 00, the first item of which was charged in November, 1860, and the last item of which was charged on the 15th of September, 1862. The account was sued on as one entire debt or demand. The defendants pleaded the statute of limitations in bar of the plaintiff’s right to recover. The record shows that there were mutual dealings between the parties (whether merchants or not, does not affirmatively appear,) up to the 15th September, 1862. Four years, therefore, had not elapsed from the date of the last item in the account to the time of. the suspension-of the running of the statute of limitations, by the Ordinance of the Convention in November, 1865; and there was no error in the Court below in refusing to sanction the certiorari, on the ground that the account was not barred by the statute of limitations: See Fellows v. Greimarin, Dudley’s Georgia Reports, 100. Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Walker & Co. v. Mercer & DeGraffenried, 41 Ga. 44 (Ga. 1870).

41 Ga. 44 (Thomas Walker & Co. v. Mercer & DeGraffenried) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marks v. Maxwell Bros. Furniture Co.
177 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Rountree v. Brown
95 S.E. 375 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Youmans v. Moore
74 S.E. 710 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Ford v. Clark
72 Ga. 760 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)
Madden v. Blain
66 Ga. 49 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)