Thomas W. Simmons v. Dr. Morris Doctor Quinones Balvir Kapil
Opinion
56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas W. SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dr. MORRIS; Doctor Quinones; Balvir Kapil, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6346.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 31, 1995.
Thomas W. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Morris, No. CA-94-168-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
56 F.3d 62 (Thomas W. Simmons v. Dr. Morris Doctor Quinones Balvir Kapil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.