Thomas W. Sankey v. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association K2 Consulting & Services, LLC Shannon L. Kimmel And Mike Hazlewood

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 28, 2021
• Docket: 13-21-00297-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00297-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

THOMAS W. SANKEY, Appellant,

v.

TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION; K2 CONSULTING & SERVICES, LLC; SHANNON L. KIMMEL; AND MIKE HAZLEWOOD, Appellees.

On Petition for Permissive Appeal from the 156th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.

ORDER Before Chief Justices Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Order Per Curiam

Thomas W. Sankey has filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal

challenging the trial court’s order granting Texas Windstorm Insurance Association’s Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment in trial court cause number 19-0268. 1 See TEX.

R. APP. P. 28.3; TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d), (f).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for permissive appeal

is of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT permission

to appeal. Thus, a notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed on this date. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 28.3(k); see also id. R. 25.1(c) (“A party who seeks to alter the trial court’s

judgment or other appealable order must file a notice of appeal.”). The appeal will be

governed by the rules for accelerated appeals. See id. R. 28.1 (“The deadlines and

procedures for filing the record and briefs in an accelerated appeal are provided in Rules

35.1 and 38.6.”).

We direct the Clerk of the Court to file a copy of this order with the trial court clerk.

See id. R. 28.3(k).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of September, 2021.

1 The parties filed an agreed motion for permissive interlocutory appeal with the trial court, which

the trial court granted on August 18, 2021. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 168. 2