Thomas W. McArthur v. Clark Clifford, Etc.

Fourth Circuit

Thomas W. McArthur v. Clark Clifford, Etc.

402 F.2d 58

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1968·No. 12816_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants’ army reserve units were ordered to active duty under Public Law 89-687, 80 Stat. 980. In Morse v. Boswell, 4th Cir., August 26, 1968, 401 F.2d 544, we denied relief to other reservists similarly situated. Additionally, we conclude that 10 U.S.C. § 673a did not by implication either repeal or render void Public Law 89-687.

The appellees’ motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s order denying the issuance of writs of habeas corpus is granted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellants’ army reserve units were ordered to active duty under Public Law 89-687, 80 Stat. 980. In Morse v. Boswell, 4th Cir., August 26, 1968, 401 F.2d 544, we denied relief to other reservists similarly situated. Additionally, we conclude that 10 U.S.C. § 673a did not by implication either repeal or render void Public Law 89-687.

The appellees’ motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s order denying the issuance of writs of habeas corpus is granted.

Judgment affirmed.

Thomas W. McArthur v. Clark Clifford, Etc., 402 F.2d 58 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

402 F.2d 58 (Thomas W. McArthur v. Clark Clifford, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related