Thomas v. Woodhouse

23 F. Cas. 986, 1 Cranch 341

This text of 23 F. Cas. 986 (Thomas v. Woodhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Woodhouse, 23 F. Cas. 986, 1 Cranch 341 (circtddc 1806).

Opinion

THE COURT continued this cause to enable the defendant to give notice (according to law of Virginia, P. P. Ill), that security for costs will be required.

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

contri, thought that the law did not intend that the plaintiff should be defeated of his trial, unless sixty days' notice had already been gi’-en.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F. Cas. 986, 1 Cranch 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-woodhouse-circtddc-1806.