Thomas v. Winter

21 Ga. 358
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1857·No. No. 72·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[359]*359 By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

In this case the only question is, whether the Court below has the right to hear and determine the demurrer of two of defendants before the other defendants had been served with the bill.

We think that the Court had this right. Parties defendants may sever in equity, and each may put in a separate or a different defence. If so, it would seem to follow as a matter of course, that separate defences may be determined separately, at least if they are such that their determination is a matter for the Court and not for the jury.

■ Such separate determination cannot, in general, affect the fights of any of the other parties in the case, whether parties plaintiff or parties defendant.

We say, therefore, that the Court ought to have determined the demurrer. As to what the judgment on the demurrer should have been, we say nothing.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Winter, 21 Ga. 358 (Ga. 1857).

21 Ga. 358 (Thomas v. Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boswell v. Boswell
95 S.E. 247 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)