Thomas v. Winter
This text of 21 Ga. 358 (Thomas v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[359]*359 By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
In this case the only question is, whether the Court below has the right to hear and determine the demurrer of two of defendants before the other defendants had been served with the bill.
We think that the Court had this right. Parties defendants may sever in equity, and each may put in a separate or a different defence. If so, it would seem to follow as a matter of course, that separate defences may be determined separately, at least if they are such that their determination is a matter for the Court and not for the jury.
■ Such separate determination cannot, in general, affect the fights of any of the other parties in the case, whether parties plaintiff or parties defendant.
We say, therefore, that the Court ought to have determined the demurrer. As to what the judgment on the demurrer should have been, we say nothing.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Ga. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-winter-ga-1857.