Thomas v. Winkler

Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Winkler

158 F. App'x 508

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 29, 2005·No. No. 05-6669·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lyndell Thomas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord[509]*509ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Winkler, No. CA-04-1003-FL-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lyndell Thomas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord[509]*509ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Winkler, No. CA-04-1003-FL-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Thomas v. Winkler, 158 F. App'x 508 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

158 F. App'x 508 (Thomas v. Winkler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related