Thomas v. Weed

14 Johns. 255
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The remedy by action of debt for “ the amount of the execution,” given by the 13th section of the 25 dollar act, (1 N. R. L. 395.,) is in the nature of a penalty, and the measure of the penalty cannot be extended beyond the letter of the statute.

If the plaintiff below had pursued his common law remedy, by a special action on the case, for negligence, or by an action for money had and received, he would have been entitled to interest on the sum proved to have been received by the constable, or actually lost by his negligence. If the creditor, as in this case, chooses to avail himself of the statute remedy, so as to relieve himself from the necessity of proving actual loss, he must be satisfied with “ the amount of the execution.”

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Weed, 14 Johns. 255 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

14 Johns. 255 (Thomas v. Weed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Hickey
12 App. D.C. 269 (D.C. Circuit, 1898)
Wilson v. . City of Troy
32 N.E. 44 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Eddy v. Lafayette
49 F. 807 (Eighth Circuit, 1892)
Smith v. Morgan
41 N.W. 532 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)
Currie v. . Worthy
48 N.C. 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1856)
Lash v. . Ziglar
27 N.C. 702 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1845)
Reid v. President & Directors of the Rensselaer Glass Factory
3 Cow. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)