Thomas v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Thomas v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

233 Md. 607

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedDecember 10, 1963

DocketApp. No. 75

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 Md. 607 (Thomas v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 233 Md. 607 (Md. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of Judge Foster in the court below, and for the further reason that after a voluntary plea of guilty, entered in his presence by privately retained counsel, all of the irregularities now claimed were waived, and would not have been available, even on direct appeal. Case v. State, 228 Md. 551, 554. Cf. Roberts v. Warden, 221 Md. 576, 580.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of Judge Foster in the court below, and for the further reason that after a voluntary plea of guilty, entered in his presence by privately retained counsel, all of the irregularities now claimed were waived, and would not have been available, even on direct appeal. Case v. State, 228 Md. 551, 554. Cf. Roberts v. Warden, 221 Md. 576, 580.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 Md. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack