Thomas v. Warden, Federal Detention Center
This text of 144 F. App'x 341 (Thomas v. Warden, Federal Detention Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these consolidated appeals, Keith Thomas appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Warden, CA-05-247-1 (E.D.Va., Mar. 16, 2005); Thomas v. Doe, CA-05-265-1 (E.D.Va., Mar. 22, 2005). We deny Thomas’ motion for injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 F. App'x 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-warden-federal-detention-center-ca4-2005.