Thomas v. Wanamaker
129 F. 92, 63 C.C.A. 594, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4020
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 17, 1904·No. No. 33·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Nothing need be added to the opinion of the Board of Appraisers. We think it adequately supports the decision made by the board, and the decree of the Circuit Court sustaining that decision is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Wanamaker, 129 F. 92, 63 C.C.A. 594, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4020 (3d Cir. 1904).
129 F. 92 (Thomas v. Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stanley Doggett, Inc. v. United States
10 Cust. Ct. 161 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)
Drakenfeld & Co. v. United States
9 Ct. Cust. 124 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1919)
Bischoff v. United States
7 Ct. Cust. 138 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1916)
Loewenthal v. United States
6 Ct. Cust. 209 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1915)
Knauth v. United States
4 Ct. Cust. 58 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1913)
Carter, Webster & Co. v. United States
143 F. 256 (Fourth Circuit, 1906)
United States v. Schwarz
140 F. 302 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1905)
Hall v. United States
136 F. 774 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Hall & Bishop v. United States
131 F. 648 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1904)