Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc

W.D. Oklahoma

Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided April 12, 2021·No. 5:21-cv-00094·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CELIA THOMAS, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-21-94-G WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) filed on February 16, 2021. The Motion seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's Petition (Doc. No. 1-5). On March 9, 2021, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint supersedes the Petition and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (0th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2021.

(Barba B. Kadota United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CELIA THOMAS, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-21-94-G WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) filed on February 16, 2021. The Motion seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's Petition (Doc. No. 1-5). On March 9, 2021, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint supersedes the Petition and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (0th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2021.

(Barba B. Kadota United States District Judge

Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc, (W.D. Okla. 2021).

Pincite

Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc (Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related