Thomas v. U.S. Department of Education
Opinion
Jay Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against the Department of Education. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’ motion for jurisdiction and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No. 8:13-cv-01375-DKC (D. Md. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [208] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
547 F. App'x 207 (Thomas v. U.S. Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.