Thomas v. Universal Music Group
This text of Thomas v. Universal Music Group (Thomas v. Universal Music Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAZE D. THOMAS, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-10013 (VSB) FENNEAS EILISH; BILLY EILISH; INTERSCOPE RECORDS/DARKROOM ORDER OF SERVICE RECORDS; UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP; UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP HOLDING COMPANY, Defendants. VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action alleging copyright infringement. By order dated November 29, 2023, Plaintiff’s was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees. DISCUSSION A. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 Plaintiff names as Defendant singer and songwriter Billie Eilish, but in the caption of the complaint, Plaintiff writes her name as “Billy Eilish.” Plaintiff also names as Defendant Billie Eilish’s brother, Fenneas O’Connell, but Plaintiff writes his name as Fenneas Eilish. In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, and clear intention to bring claims against Billie Eilish and Fenneas O’Connell, the Clerk of Court is directed, under Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to substitute Billie Eilish as a Defendant, for Defendant Billy Eilish, and Fenneas O’Connell as a Defendant, for Defendant Fenneas Eilish. This amendment is without prejudice to any defenses that Defendants Billie Eilish and Fenneas O’Connell may wish to assert. B. Service on Defendants Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.1 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to
serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Fenneas O’Connell, Billie Eilish, Interscope Records/Darkroom Records, Universal Music Group, and Universal Music Group Holding Company through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for
service). Plaintiff must notify me in writing if his address changes, and I may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.
1 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. Therefore, the time to serve is extended until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed, under Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to substitute Billie Eilish as a Defendant, for Defendant Billy Eilish, and Fenneas O’Connell as a Defendant, for Defendant Fenneas Eilish. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses for Defendants Fenneas O’Connell, Billie Eilish, Interscope Records/Darkroom Records, Universal Music Group, and Universal Music Group Holding Company, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these Defendants, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 27, 2024 , New York, New York I Hl I VERNON S. BRODERICK United States District Judge
DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES
Fenneas O’Connell c/o Universal Music Group 1755 Broadway #6 New York, New York 10019 Billie Eilish c/o Universal Music Group 1755 Broadway #6 New York, New York 10019 Interscope Records/Darkroom Records c/o Universal Music Group 1755 Broadway #6 New York, New York 10019 Universal Music Group 1755 Broadway #6 New York, New York 10019 Universal Music Group Holding Company 1755 Broadway #6 New York, New York 10019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas v. Universal Music Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-universal-music-group-nysd-2024.