Thomas v. United States

715 A.2d 121, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 130, 1998 WL 425491
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 30, 1998
DocketNo. 96-CF-1790
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 715 A.2d 121 (Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. United States, 715 A.2d 121, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 130, 1998 WL 425491 (D.C. 1998).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Trenton C. Thomas was convicted by a jury of unlawful possession of cocaine1 and of several weapons offenses.2 The prosecution of Thomas was initiated after police recovered from the trunk of Thomas’ automobile a machine gun, ammunition, and a battery cable bag containing crack cocaine with a street value of approximately $6700. On appeal, Thomas contends, that his convictions must be reversed because, according to Thomas, the judge had declared a mistrial before the jury returned its verdict of guilty. All three members of the court agree that this contention does not warrant reversal. Each judge has stated his or her reasons in a separate concurring opinion.

Thomas has also made a number of other claims of error. These claims are rejected for the reasons stated in footnote 4 to Judge Schwelb’s opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RONNIE L. PAYNE v. UNITED STATES
154 A.3d 602 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
RAYSHAWN CLARK, DWAYNE HILTON and PERNELL LEE v. UNITED STATES
147 A.3d 318 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Reyes-Arreola
1999 NMCA 086 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
715 A.2d 121, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 130, 1998 WL 425491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-united-states-dc-1998.