Thomas v. United States
This text of 715 A.2d 121 (Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Trenton C. Thomas was convicted by a jury of unlawful possession of cocaine1 and of several weapons offenses.2 The prosecution of Thomas was initiated after police recovered from the trunk of Thomas’ automobile a machine gun, ammunition, and a battery cable bag containing crack cocaine with a street value of approximately $6700. On appeal, Thomas contends, that his convictions must be reversed because, according to Thomas, the judge had declared a mistrial before the jury returned its verdict of guilty. All three members of the court agree that this contention does not warrant reversal. Each judge has stated his or her reasons in a separate concurring opinion.
Thomas has also made a number of other claims of error. These claims are rejected for the reasons stated in footnote 4 to Judge Schwelb’s opinion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
715 A.2d 121, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 130, 1998 WL 425491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-united-states-dc-1998.