Thomas v. United States
This text of 193 Ct. Cl. 1083 (Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counterclaim; third-party, impleading of. — Plaintiffs brought this suit to recover from the United States as defendant for the taking of a leasehold interest. This case comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim of the third-party defendants against plaintiffs and has been considered, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument. Defendant has filed a cross-petition [1084]*1084against the third-party defendants under an indemnity agreement, and said third-parties, besides answering, have counterclaimed against plaintiffs for alleged breaches of provisions in the leases by the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs, having moved to dismiss the counterclaim, the court hereby determines that the cause asserted in said counterclaim is, if valid, a separate cause of action which is beyond the authority of this court to decide. See Rolls Royce Ltd. v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 694, 364 F. 2d 415 (1966). On October 2, 1970 the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim, and dismissed the counterclaim without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 Ct. Cl. 1083, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 83, 1970 WL 3627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-united-states-cc-1970.