Thomas v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2004
Docket03-7809
StatusUnpublished

This text of Thomas v. United States (Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. United States, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7809

MELVIN AVON THOMAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 03-3039-1-CCB)

Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 2, 2004

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Avon Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Melvin Avon Thomas appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v.

United States, No. CA-03-3039-1-CCB (D. Md. filed Nov. 3, 2003 &

entered Nov. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-united-states-ca4-2004.