Thomas v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomas v. Thomas

48 A.D.2d 666, 370 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 666 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Thomas, 48 A.D.2d 666, 370 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 31, 1974, as fixed the amount of child support payable by him at $35 per week, after a hearing. Order modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the amount of child support to $20 per week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The Probation Department of the Family Court, Orange County, is directed to return to appellant the moneys it is holding in escrow pursuant to the order of this court entered January 20, 1975. Under the circumstances of this case, the award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated October 31, 1974, as fixed the amount of child support payable by him at $35 per week, after a hearing. Order modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the amount of child support to $20 per week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The Probation Department of the Family Court, Orange County, is directed to return to appellant the moneys it is holding in escrow pursuant to the order of this court entered January 20, 1975. Under the circumstances of this case, the award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 666, 370 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1975.