Thomas v. Thomas

101 A. 1055, 87 N.J. Eq. 668, 2 Stock. 668, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 474
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A. 1055 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Thomas, 101 A. 1055, 87 N.J. Eq. 668, 2 Stock. 668, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 474 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From the testimony taken before the advisory master we reach the same conclusion that he did, viz., that the petition of the appellant should be dismissed. The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed.

For 'affirmance—Garrison, Swayze, Trenctiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13. ■ For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 1055, 87 N.J. Eq. 668, 2 Stock. 668, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-nj-1917.