Thomas v. Thomas

64 Mo. 353
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Hough, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit for divorce, instituted in the Joplin court of common pleas. At the June term, 1874, a decree of divorce a vinculo matrimonii was rendered in favor of the complainant, and at the same term the defendant filed a motion to set that decree aside. It does not appear from the record that this motion was ever disposed of. The present writ of error seems to have been sued out prematurely.

Until the motion to set aside the decree was overruled by the court there was no judgment from which an appeal could be taken, or which could be reviewed on writ of error.

The writ must therefore be dismissed.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Thomas, 64 Mo. 353 (Mo. 1876).

64 Mo. 353 (Thomas v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. Miller
253 S.W.2d 821 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1953)
Tremper v. Tremper
177 P. 868 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Warren v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
99 S.W. 16 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
Walter v. Scofield
67 S.W. 276 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
Scott v. Scott
44 Mo. App. 600 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
State ex rel. Scott v. Smith
104 Mo. 419 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)