Thomas v. Thomas
This text of 88 S.E. 584 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Without dealing with the merits of the question of the wife’s right to alimony under the facts of this ease, where she brought an action in her own name, and it was conceded that prior to her suit she had become insane, had been committed to the State sanitarium at Milledgeville, and had been allowed to go thence on furlough under custody of her father, and it was further admitted by her counsel that she was insane at the time of sueh commitment and was of unsound mind at the time of the trial, over objection duly raised it was error to allow the case to proceed in the name of sueh insane wife and to award to her temporary alimony and counsel, fees.
2. On the hearing of an application for temporary alimony in vacation [112]*112before the term of court to which the suit is returnable has arrived, it is error to pass an order striking a plea in abatement.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 584, 145 Ga. 111, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-ga-1916.