Thomas v. Thomas
This text of 902 So. 2d 881 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Milton THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
Kathy A. THOMAS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se.
Francis Jerome Shea, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of April 8, 2005, the Court has determined that the order captioned as a "Final Order of Dissolution of Marriage" is not a final order. Specifically, the lower tribunal's reservation of jurisdiction to consider the issue of a possible reduction in the value of any IRA or pension plan by the appellant, indicates that the lower tribunal's judicial labor is incomplete and renders the order nonfinal. See Hoffman v. O'Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.
ERVIN, PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
902 So. 2d 881, 2005 WL 1249087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-fladistctapp-2005.