Thomas v. Thomas
This text of 54 So. 3d 363 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Remand-from the Alabama Supreme Court
The Alabama Supreme Court has held that the prior judgment of this court is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Ex parte Thomas, 54 So.3d 356, 362 (Ala.2010). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we vacate our judgment, dismiss the appeal, and instruct the trial court to vacate its judgment.
APPEAL DISMISSED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 So. 3d 363, 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 2983137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-alacivapp-2010.