Thomas v. Thomas

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Thomas v. Thomas

54 So. 3d 363, 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 2983137

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 392 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 30, 2010·No. 2071171·Published

Opinion

On Remand-from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMAS, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has held that the prior judgment of this court is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Ex parte Thomas, 54 So.3d 356, 362 (Ala.2010). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we vacate our judgment, dismiss the appeal, and instruct the trial court to vacate its judgment.

APPEAL DISMISSED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, BRYAN, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand-from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMAS, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has held that the prior judgment of this court is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Ex parte Thomas, 54 So.3d 356, 362 (Ala.2010). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we vacate our judgment, dismiss the appeal, and instruct the trial court to vacate its judgment.

APPEAL DISMISSED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, BRYAN, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Thomas v. Thomas, 54 So. 3d 363, 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 2983137 (Ala. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

54 So. 3d 363 (Thomas v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related