Thomas v. Thomas
This text of 49 So. 1027 (Thomas v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree overruling a demurrer to a cross-bill. There is no authority of law for an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling a demurrer to a cross-bill. — Code-1907, § 2838; [504]*504Barclay, Assignee, et al. v. Spragins, 80 Ala. 357; Jones v. Woodward Iron Co., 90 Ala. 545, 8 South. 132; Festorazzi v. St. J. C. Ch., 96 Ala. 178, 10 South. 521; Buford v. Ward, 108 Ala. 307, 19 South. 357; Richardson v. First Nat. Bank, 119 Ala. 286, 24 South. 54; Woodruff v. Adair, 120 Ala. 659, 24 South. 1006; Throne-Franklin shoe Co. v. Gunn, 123 Ala. 640, 26 South. 198.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 So. 1027, 161 Ala. 503, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-thomas-ala-1909.