Thomas v. Thomas
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree overruling a demurrer to a cross-bill. There is no authority of law for an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling a demurrer to a cross-bill. — Code-1907, § 2838; [504] Barclay, Assignee, et al. v. Spragins, 80 Ala. 357; Jones v. Woodward Iron Co., 90 Ala. 545, 8 South. 132; Festorazzi v. St. J. C. Ch., 96 Ala. 178, 10 South. 521; Buford v. Ward, 108 Ala. 307, 19 South. 357; Richardson v. First Nat. Bank, 119 Ala. 286, 24 South. 54; Woodruff v. Adair, 120 Ala. 659, 24 South. 1006; Throne-Franklin shoe Co. v. Gunn, 123 Ala. 640, 26 South. 198.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
49 So. 1027 (Thomas v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.