Thomas v. . Tea Company

152 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 822, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 504
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 23, 1930·Published

Opinion

Civil action by plaintiff, clerk in the defendant's grocery store, to recover for an injury sustained on 6 April, 1928, while he was cutting a piece of cheese for a customer with a dull, long-bladed and short-handled knife, which slipped and caused him to cut finger — later becoming *Page 823 infected — said knife having been used by plaintiff for the same purpose for about six months.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. We perceive no valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit. The principles and authorities applicable and pertinent are discussed inGaither v. Clement, 183 N.C. 450, 111 S.E. 782, and Wright v. Thompson,171 N.C. 88, 87 S.E. 963.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. . Tea Company, 152 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 822, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 504 (N.C. 1930).

152 S.E. 926 (Thomas v. . Tea Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. . Thompson
87 S.E. 963 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co.
111 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)