Thomas v. . Tea Company

152 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 822, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 504
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 23, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.E. 926 (Thomas v. . Tea Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. . Tea Company, 152 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 822, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 504 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Civil action by plaintiff, clerk in the defendant's grocery store, to recover for an injury sustained on 6 April, 1928, while he was cutting a piece of cheese for a customer with a dull, long-bladed and short-handled knife, which slipped and caused him to cut finger — later becoming *Page 823 infected — said knife having been used by plaintiff for the same purpose for about six months.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. We perceive no valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit. The principles and authorities applicable and pertinent are discussed inGaither v. Clement, 183 N.C. 450, 111 S.E. 782, and Wright v. Thompson,171 N.C. 88, 87 S.E. 963.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. . Thompson
87 S.E. 963 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co.
111 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 S.E. 926, 198 N.C. 822, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-tea-company-nc-1930.