Thomas v. Superior Court

18 P.2d 756, 129 Cal. App. 786, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. Superior Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Cal. App. 2d 356
California Court of Appeal·Decided January 30, 1933·No. Docket No. 4843.·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

This petition for a writ of prohibition is based upon the same order and the identical facts which are disclosed in a similar petition between the same parties, in which previous proceeding an opinion of this court was filed January 28, 1933 (ante, p. 282), except that this petition involves the nonpayment of installments of alimony which occurred subsequent to those which were involved in the former proceeding.

To the petition in the present proceeding a demurrer was filed. It is asserted the petition fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

[1] Upon the authority of Thomas v. Superior Court, ante, p. 282 [18 P.2d 755], the demurrer to the petition for a writ of prohibition in the present proceeding is sustained and the writ is discharged. *Page 787

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Superior Court, 18 P.2d 756, 129 Cal. App. 786, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1183 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

18 P.2d 756 (Thomas v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Superior Court
18 P.2d 755 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)