Thomas v. Stevens
4 Johns. Ch. 607, 1820 N.Y. LEXIS 157, 1820 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 51
Opinion
upon the facts admitted, being perfectly satisfied of the intention of the will, and of the misnomer, on the authority of the cases of Beaumont v. Fell, (2 P. Wms. 140.) and Bradwin v. Harpur, (Amb. 374.) de[608] creed, that the defendants should convey the bank share to the plaintiff. *
Decree accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. Stevens, 4 Johns. Ch. 607, 1820 N.Y. LEXIS 157, 1820 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 51 (N.Y. 1820).
4 Johns. Ch. 607 (Thomas v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tallman v. Tallman
23 N.Y.S. 734 (Superior Court of New York, 1893)
Nelson v. McDonald
16 N.Y.S. 273 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Woman's Union Missionary Society of America v. Mead
23 N.E. 603 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1890)
Mairs v. Freeman
3 Redf. 181 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1877)
In re Cahn
3 Redf. 31 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1877)
Trustees of Fund of Episcopate v. Colegrove
6 Thomp. & Cook 614 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)
Lefevre v. Lefevre
2 Thomp. & Cook 330 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
St. Luke's Home for Indigent Christian Females v. Association for the Relief of Respectable Aged Indigent Females
2 Jones & S. 241 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1872)
Eastman v. Knight
35 N.H. 551 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1857)