Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State

840 S.W.2d 958, 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 207, 1992 WL 334146
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 18, 1992·No. No. 547-91·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Appellant guilty of possession of cocaine. The court found the enhancement allegations to be true and assessed punishment at confinement for thirty-five years. The Court of Appeals reversed Appellant’s conviction. Thomas v. State, 807 S.W.2d 786 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1991) (opinion on rehearing).

After further consideration of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that the State’s petition was improvidently granted.

The State’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 840 S.W.2d 958, 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 207, 1992 WL 334146 (Tex. 1992).

840 S.W.2d 958 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilchrist v. State
784 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Victor v. State
995 S.W.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
King v. State
895 S.W.2d 701 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Jenkins v. State
870 S.W.2d 626 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Dickerson v. State
866 S.W.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Joseph v. State
866 S.W.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)