Thomas v. State

134 S.W.2d 300, 138 Tex. Crim. 87, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 580
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Tex. Crim. 533
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 13, 1939·No. No. 20682.·Published

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a container to which no tax stamp showing the payment of the tax due to the State of Texas was affixed; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The chief witness in the case who purchased the liquor in question was an Inspector for the Texas Liquor Control Board.

The record before us presents but one question which it is necessary for us to consider. Complaint is made that, under the facts of this case, the witness was an accomplice and that appellant could not be convicted on his uncorroborated testimony. This question has been before this court recently in several cases. It has been thoroughly considered and decided adversely to the contention of the appellant. See Stevens v. State, 110 S. W. (2d) 906, and cases there cited; also Carpenter v. State, No. 20,572, (not yet reported). (Reported in this volume) Art. 666, 23a, subdivision 8, P. C.

No reversible error being shown in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 134 S.W.2d 300, 138 Tex. Crim. 87, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 580 (Tex. 1939).

134 S.W.2d 300 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stevens v. State
110 S.W.2d 906 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)