Thomas v. State
230 S.W. 156, 89 Tex. Crim. 106, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 367
Opinions
Conviction is for violation of the law prohibiting the possession of equipment for manufacturing intoxicating liquors except for certain named purposes. Punishment is fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
There is no sentence in the record, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of the case. (See Article 856, Code of Criminal Procedure).
The appeal must be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. State, 230 S.W. 156, 89 Tex. Crim. 106, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 367 (Tex. 1921).
230 S.W. 156 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lay v. State
70 S.W.2d 179 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Taylor v. State
281 S.W. 547 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Dirden v. State
247 S.W. 870 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Washington v. State
91 Tex. Crim. 632 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)