Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thomas v. State

954 S.W.2d 680, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888, 1997 WL 679635

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 4, 1997

DocketNo. WD 53743

StatusPublished

This text of 954 S.W.2d 680 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 954 S.W.2d 680, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888, 1997 WL 679635 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with one count of the class A felony of distribution of a controlled substance near a school, and one count of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. Appellant testified that he committed the crimes as charged, and a plea agreement was entered into which reduced the class A felony to a class B felony, and the class C felony was dismissed. He was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment, to run concurrently with a sentence he received for crimes committed in Jackson County. His Rule 24.035 motion alleging that his plea counsel was ineffective when he misrepresented the period of time he would be required to serve on his sentence, was denied after evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with one count of the class A felony of distribution of a controlled substance near a school, and one count of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. Appellant testified that he committed the crimes as charged, and a plea agreement was entered into which reduced the class A felony to a class B felony, and the class C felony was dismissed. He was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment, to run concurrently with a sentence he received for crimes committed in Jackson County. His Rule 24.035 motion alleging that his plea counsel was ineffective when he misrepresented the period of time he would be required to serve on his sentence, was denied after evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

954 S.W.2d 680, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888, 1997 WL 679635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-moctapp-1997.