Thomas v. State
This text of 878 S.W.2d 528 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Movant, Earl Thomas, appeals from the dismissal of his motion for postconviction relief. Movant has previously filed a motion under Rule 29.15, which was denied after an evidentiary hearing. Following a consolidated appeal, this court denied his claims .and affirmed the judgments. State v. Thomas, 830 S.W.2d 546 (Mo.App.E.D.1992). Although movant now purports to seek relief under Rule 74.06, in fact his motion is a successive Rule 29.15 motion.
Rule 29.15(k) prohibits, successive Rule 29.15 motions. The trial court properly dismissed the motion.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
878 S.W.2d 528, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 1994 WL 313621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-moctapp-1994.