Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thomas v. State

628 S.W.2d 922, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3879

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 1982

DocketNo. 44133

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 628 S.W.2d 922 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 628 S.W.2d 922, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3879 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of second degree murder and given a sentence of 55 years imprisonment. He appealed his conviction to this court, and we affirmed in an opinion dated February 6, 1979. State v. Thomas, 579 S.W.2d 145 (Mo.App.1979). Movant’s motion for transfer to the supreme court was denied March 16, 1979. For a statement of the facts of the case, see our opinion on direct appeal.

Movant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 27.26 in which he alleged that the trial court denied him the right to a fair trial when it denied him the right to present character witnesses on his behalf. This contention was raised on direct appeal and answered by this court. 579 S.W.2d at 148. Movant cannot obtain another review of the issue by means of a motion under Rule 27.26. Sweazea v. State, 515 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Mo.banc 1974); Pittman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 638, 640 (Mo.App.1980). Furthermore our re-review reinforces our view that there is no merit to movant’s contention.

Judgment affirmed.

SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of second degree murder and given a sentence of 55 years imprisonment. He appealed his conviction to this court, and we affirmed in an opinion dated February 6, 1979. State v. Thomas, 579 S.W.2d 145 (Mo.App.1979). Movant’s motion for transfer to the supreme court was denied March 16, 1979. For a statement of the facts of the case, see our opinion on direct appeal.

Movant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 27.26 in which he alleged that the trial court denied him the right to a fair trial when it denied him the right to present character witnesses on his behalf. This contention was raised on direct appeal and answered by this court. 579 S.W.2d at 148. Movant cannot obtain another review of the issue by means of a motion under Rule 27.26. Sweazea v. State, 515 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Mo.banc 1974); Pittman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 638, 640 (Mo.App.1980). Furthermore our re-review reinforces our view that there is no merit to movant’s contention.

Judgment affirmed.

SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

628 S.W.2d 922, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-moctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack