Thomas v. State

6 Mo. 457
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedAugust 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 6 Mo. 457 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 6 Mo. 457 (Mo. 1840).

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Tompkins Judge.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for horse racing. The defendant, demurred to the indictment; the circuit court-over ruled the demurrer, and then assessed the defendants’ fine to ten dollars.

The indictment charges the offence in the words of the -statute, and comment is useless.

But the statute directs that, in all cases where the defendant does not confess the indictment to be true, a plea of not guilty shall be entered, and the '-■ame proceedings shall be had as if the defendant had indictment. formally pleaded not guilty to such

The law never contemplated that a man charged ly, means to confess the indictment tobe true when he murs: even in civil cases the defendant who has a demurrer decided against him, is allowed to withdraw his demurrer and plead. A jury then should have been empannelled to find whether the defendant was or was not guilty.

ceísar/for16" the circuit at-sorib/hísSU,>" name to the inaiotmijnt.

It w as also charged as a defect in the indictment, that it was nc,t subscribed by the circuit attorney; and reference is made to the 6th section of the 3rd article of the act to regulate practice, at law, page 458 of the digest of 1835.— This section directs that declarations and other pleadings ^e signed by the party or his attorney,

This act purports to regulate the practice in civil cases and there is another act to regulate the practice in criminal cases.

........ I am not aware of any provision m that act requiring the circuit attorney to subscribe his name to indictments.

The- judgment of the circuit court is, reversed, and the cause will be remanded to. be proceeded in. conformably to this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. O'Kelley
157 S.W. 1055 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Cross v. People
66 Ill. App. 170 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
State v. Cottrill
6 S.E. 428 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1888)
State v. Bruce
77 Mo. 193 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1882)
City of Lexington v. Curtin
69 Mo. 626 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)
State v. Murphy
47 Mo. 274 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)
McCuen v. State
19 Ark. 630 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1858)
Neales v. State
10 Mo. 498 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Mo. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-mo-1840.