Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Thomas v. State

451 A.2d 929, 294 Md. 625, 1982 Md. LEXIS 349

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 10, 1982·No. [Nos. 83 & 130, September Term, 1981.]·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss appeal and remand case for dismissal of indictment filed by counsel for the appellant and the answer filed by the State acquiescing in the motion to dismiss and the relief sought, it is this 10th day of November, 1982

*626 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that, in accordance with the motion and acquiescence by the State, the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Baltimore County with directions to that Court to vacate the appellant’s conviction and sentence and dismiss the indictment.

Chief Judge Murphy and Judge Smith would have dismissed the appeal as moot, but would not have remanded for dismissal of the indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss appeal and remand case for dismissal of indictment filed by counsel for the appellant and the answer filed by the State acquiescing in the motion to dismiss and the relief sought, it is this 10th day of November, 1982

*626 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that, in accordance with the motion and acquiescence by the State, the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Baltimore County with directions to that Court to vacate the appellant’s conviction and sentence and dismiss the indictment.

Chief Judge Murphy and Judge Smith would have dismissed the appeal as moot, but would not have remanded for dismissal of the indictment.

Thomas v. State, 451 A.2d 929, 294 Md. 625, 1982 Md. LEXIS 349 (Md. 1982).

Pincite

451 A.2d 929 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related