Thomas v. State

171 N.E.2d 262, 241 Ind. 703, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 191
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 18, 1961
DocketNo. 0-621
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 N.E.2d 262 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 171 N.E.2d 262, 241 Ind. 703, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 191 (Ind. 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam

Petitioner has filed a pleading called a “Petition for Writ of Non-Suite” in this Court according to which he seeks to review the action of the lower court sustaining a demurrer to his petition for writ of error coram nobis.

If petitioner desires this Court to review the action of the lower court in sustaining a demurrer to his petition for writ of error coram nobis, he should appeal from the judgment of the lower court in accordance with the applicable statutes and rules of appellate procedure. If petitioner desires a lawyer and is without funds to procure one he should contact the public defender as petitioner is seeking a post conviction remedy.

As nothing is properly before us on petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Non-Suite,” the same is dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 171 N. E. 2d 262.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Finnan
955 N.E.2d 785 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 N.E.2d 262, 241 Ind. 703, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-ind-1961.