Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thomas v. State

33 S.E.2d 28, 72 Ga. App. 78, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 504

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 6, 1945

Docket30753.

StatusPublished

This text of 33 S.E.2d 28 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 33 S.E.2d 28, 72 Ga. App. 78, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of operating a lottery, known as the “number game.” The evidence set out in the petition for certiorari, together with the documentary evidence submitted in the answer of the trial judge, authorized the verdict. There were no special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari; and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of operating a lottery, known as the “number game.” The evidence set out in the petition for certiorari, together with the documentary evidence submitted in the answer of the trial judge, authorized the verdict. There were no special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari; and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 S.E.2d 28, 72 Ga. App. 78, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-gactapp-1945.