Thomas v. State
33 S.E.2d 28, 72 Ga. App. 78, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 504
Opinion
The accused was convicted of operating a lottery, known as the “number game.” The evidence set out in the petition for certiorari, together with the documentary evidence submitted in the answer of the trial judge, authorized the verdict. There were no special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari; and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. State, 33 S.E.2d 28, 72 Ga. App. 78, 1945 Ga. App. LEXIS 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945).
33 S.E.2d 28 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.