Thomas v. State
This text of 147 S.E. 909 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In view of the note of the trial judge, special grounds 1, 3, and 5, of the motion for a new trial are without merit.,
2. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial (some of which are too defective and incomplete to be considered) show no reversible error.
3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 S.E. 909, 39 Ga. App. 559, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-gactapp-1929.