Thomas v. State
4 S.E.2d 635, 188 Ga. 649
Opinion
The evidence, direct and circumstantial, was sufficient to show penetration, and to support the verdict that the defendant was guilty of rape. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial based upon the general grounds only.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. State, 4 S.E.2d 635, 188 Ga. 649 (Ga. 1939).
4 S.E.2d 635 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.